Don’t Solve the Wrong Problem

Why misdiagnosis is more dangerous than slow execution.

Speed is praised as a competitive advantage. Teams are encouraged to move fast, ship quickly, and respond immediately to challenges. That bias toward action can be useful, especially in uncertain environments. But it also creates a risk: solving before understanding.

When something breaks, the instinct is to fix it as quickly as possible. Action feels productive, while diagnosis can feel like a delay. However, premature action often locks you into the wrong solution. Moving fast in the wrong direction only compounds the problem.

Separate Symptoms from Causes

Most problems don’t present themselves clearly. What you see first is usually a symptom, not the underlying cause. Declining growth might look like a marketing issue when it’s actually a product problem. Team friction might appear interpersonal when it’s rooted in unclear roles or incentives.

If you treat symptoms as causes, you create temporary relief without real progress. The issue reappears in a different form, often more complex than before. Taking time to understand what’s actually driving the problem prevents cycles of rework. Diagnosis creates leverage.

Slow Down to See Clearly

Clarity rarely comes from urgency. It comes from stepping back long enough to ask better questions. What changed? What assumptions are we making? What evidence supports this explanation versus others?

This kind of thinking requires discipline, especially when pressure is high. It may feel like slowing down, but it’s actually reducing the risk of wasted effort. A few extra hours of analysis can prevent weeks of misdirected execution.

Involve the Right Perspectives

Misdiagnosis often happens in isolation. When the same people who are closest to the problem are also responsible for solving it, blind spots persist. Assumptions go unchallenged, and familiar patterns repeat.

Bringing in different perspectives changes that dynamic. People from other teams, backgrounds, or levels of experience can see what insiders miss. They ask different questions and challenge default explanations. Better inputs lead to better conclusions.

Test Before You Commit

Even strong hypotheses can be wrong. The goal is not to be right immediately, but to get to the right answer efficiently. Small tests and experiments allow you to validate assumptions before committing fully.

This approach reduces risk. Instead of betting everything on a single solution, you gather evidence incrementally. If you’re wrong, you learn quickly and adjust. If you’re right, you move forward with confidence.

Solve the Right Problem

Every problem presents two challenges: understanding it and fixing it. Most teams underestimate the first and over-invest in the second. They rush to act without fully understanding what they are acting on.

The highest leverage comes from getting the diagnosis right. Once the problem is clear, the solution often becomes simpler. Don’t just move fast—make sure you’re moving in the right direction.

Mahalo!
Guy

P.S.

Everybody has something to hide. Not because they’ve done something wrong, but because privacy equals freedom.

That idea is the foundation of my new book, Everybody Has Something to Hide: Why and How to Use Signal to Preserve Your Privacy, Security, and Well-Being.

I’m giving away a free EPUB version on my website—including both English and Spanish in one edition.

You can download it here.

The book explains what Signal is, how it works, what it protects, and what it doesn’t. We cover setup, disappearing messages, verification, backups, group chats, screen security, and the small mistakes that can expose sensitive information.

Most importantly, we make the case that secure communication is not extreme or political. It’s modern hygiene.

Mahalo,

Guy